<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter the Che Guevara of Microblogging?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pravdam.com/2009/09/08/is-twitter-the-che-guevara-of-microblogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pravdam.com/2009/09/08/is-twitter-the-che-guevara-of-microblogging/</link>
	<description>Pravda on Media, Technology, and Rebel Filmmaking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:07:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Footprints (10.09.09) &#124; Chris Deary</title>
		<link>http://pravdam.com/2009/09/08/is-twitter-the-che-guevara-of-microblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-47755</link>
		<dc:creator>Footprints (10.09.09) &#124; Chris Deary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pravdam.com/?p=1634#comment-47755</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Twitter the Che Guevara of Microblogging? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Twitter the Che Guevara of Microblogging? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-09-09 &#171; burningCat</title>
		<link>http://pravdam.com/2009/09/08/is-twitter-the-che-guevara-of-microblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-47753</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-09-09 &#171; burningCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pravdam.com/?p=1634#comment-47753</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Twitter the Che Guevara of Microblogging? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Twitter the Che Guevara of Microblogging? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kfirpravda</title>
		<link>http://pravdam.com/2009/09/08/is-twitter-the-che-guevara-of-microblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-47752</link>
		<dc:creator>kfirpravda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pravdam.com/?p=1634#comment-47752</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your insights Joe. Standartization flattens competitions and move it away from technology to service, marketing budget etc. If your vision is correct, Twitter as general purpose network will die even faster than I&#039;ve imagined. &lt;br&gt;Please take a look at my post about an event for IMTC called &quot;2025&quot;. It might be interesting for you to speak there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your insights Joe. Standartization flattens competitions and move it away from technology to service, marketing budget etc. If your vision is correct, Twitter as general purpose network will die even faster than I&#39;ve imagined. <br />Please take a look at my post about an event for IMTC called &#8220;2025&#8243;. It might be interesting for you to speak there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cascio</title>
		<link>http://pravdam.com/2009/09/08/is-twitter-the-che-guevara-of-microblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-47751</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cascio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pravdam.com/?p=1634#comment-47751</guid>
		<description>I agree with your conclusion and also with the reasons you advance. But I have a somewhat different picture about what the future of microblogging is. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Communication, messaging always tends to standardize around a protocol, not a specific service. We don&#039;t have 50 different telephones in our house to talk to different groups or individual people on. I gave a talk this past spring entitled &quot;The End of the CompuServe Era of Social Networking.&quot; Just like email became standardized around SMTP, so social media will converge around open standards like RSS and PubSubHubBub. Yes, individual sites like Facebook and Yahoo will have a microblogging facet to their service, but I am hopeful and confident that they will interoperate, federate with other such services, just as Yahoo and Google offer email that interoperates with any other email server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your conclusion and also with the reasons you advance. But I have a somewhat different picture about what the future of microblogging is. </p>
<p>Communication, messaging always tends to standardize around a protocol, not a specific service. We don&#39;t have 50 different telephones in our house to talk to different groups or individual people on. I gave a talk this past spring entitled &#8220;The End of the CompuServe Era of Social Networking.&#8221; Just like email became standardized around SMTP, so social media will converge around open standards like RSS and PubSubHubBub. Yes, individual sites like Facebook and Yahoo will have a microblogging facet to their service, but I am hopeful and confident that they will interoperate, federate with other such services, just as Yahoo and Google offer email that interoperates with any other email server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kfirpravda</title>
		<link>http://pravdam.com/2009/09/08/is-twitter-the-che-guevara-of-microblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-47749</link>
		<dc:creator>kfirpravda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pravdam.com/?p=1634#comment-47749</guid>
		<description>Amir - not offended at all, the whole idea of blogging is getting feedback. &lt;br&gt;In your response there is no real distinction between Twitter and Microblogging. If you look at your first paragraph, you are basically describing a microblogging service - something that I agree with you re its value. Re logging in to different sites - people are doing it already, and if there is already an active community there, it means that you have the ability to add this feature without an extra registration process. Also, there might be a scenario of logging to different sites using Facebook, Google, Open ID etc, that will solve the registration issue. &lt;br&gt;And of course, I might be completely wrong :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amir &#8211; not offended at all, the whole idea of blogging is getting feedback. <br />In your response there is no real distinction between Twitter and Microblogging. If you look at your first paragraph, you are basically describing a microblogging service &#8211; something that I agree with you re its value. Re logging in to different sites &#8211; people are doing it already, and if there is already an active community there, it means that you have the ability to add this feature without an extra registration process. Also, there might be a scenario of logging to different sites using Facebook, Google, Open ID etc, that will solve the registration issue. <br />And of course, I might be completely wrong <img src='http://pravdam.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebeccarachmany</title>
		<link>http://pravdam.com/2009/09/08/is-twitter-the-che-guevara-of-microblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-47748</link>
		<dc:creator>rebeccarachmany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pravdam.com/?p=1634#comment-47748</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t have said it better myself. Days are numbered for Twitter as a standalone service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#39;t have said it better myself. Days are numbered for Twitter as a standalone service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

